Leeds council decision on Meanwood over-55s flats overturned by government planning inspector

Flats for over-55s will be built on a site in north Leeds after a government planning inspector overturned Leeds City Council’s decision not to allow the development.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Developers said back in August 2020 that the plans for the site in Grove Lane, Meanwood, would provide extra care for older people in the community.

Read More
Leeds City Council’s annual budget proposals released

The proposals featured an H-shaped, four-storey structure containing 58 apartments for over-55s.

This is how the new development in Meanwood is expected to look once complete.This is how the new development in Meanwood is expected to look once complete.
This is how the new development in Meanwood is expected to look once complete.
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

However, the application attracted more than 300 objections from locals, some of whom told a meeting of the council’s North and East Plans Panel that it would be out of character with the neighbourhood and green space should remain.

Council planning chiefs ultimately refused planning permission in November that year, as it was considered there would have been an “inappropriate amount of overlooking” onto nearby properties.

But the developer, Roseville, lodged an appeal to the planning inspectorate which has now been upheld. It means the council must allow the development to take place.

The planning inspector’s report stated: “I have found that the proposal would conflict with some policies of the development plan due to the moderate harm arising to views of the important landscape beyond the site.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“However, that moderate harm would be outweighed by the substantial benefits arising in respect of housing supply, and in particular the significant contribution towards meeting an identified specialist housing need and affordable housing, in accordance with development plan policies and the Framework.

“There are also more limited benefits including the provision of a publicly accessible pocket park, public right of way improvements, an increase in biodiversity, employment and support for local services.

“In this case, the substantial weight that I afford to the benefits of this proposal outweighs the moderate weight that I attribute to the conflict with specified policies in the development plan for the area. Consequently, and on balance, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.”

The decision will be discussed again by members of the plans panel on Thursday, February 8.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Support the YEP and become a subscriber today. Enjoy unlimited access to local news and the latest on Leeds United. With a digital subscription, you'll see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Click here to subscribe.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.