Nick Baines: To portray bishops as anti-Conservative over refugees is ‘wrong, lazy and ridiculous’
I AM not sure what the politicians and political commentators have been doing today? Still seething about the letter written by 84 bishops to the Prime Minister asking for a rethink on the numbers of refugees to be let into the UK? Still sitting behind screens being sarcastic about bishops and their big houses (which are actually their offices)? I have read today that some responses are becoming less hysterical now that the letter has actually been read.
Forgive me for being just a teensy bit touchy on this. I am in Sri Lanka visiting our link bishop of Colombo. The Church of England dioceses have links across the world: West Yorkshire and the Dales has close connections with Sudan, Tanzania, Sri Lanka, Sweden (Skara), USA (Southwestern Virginia), Pakistan and Germany (Erfurt, though, obviously, this is not an Anglican link).
In other words, rather than simply pontificating about situations, we actually have grassroots connections with them. When asked why the bishops don’t wade in on, say, the 100,000 killed in South Sudan, well ... actually we have and we do. We also go to Sudan and see the impact of the conflicts in the South. It could be argued that we know what we are talking about.
So, back to the letter to the Prime Minister. If you are one of those seething about the well-meaning bishops getting it wrong again, have a look at this first:
First, the bishops agreed the letter to David Cameron some five weeks ago. It was kept private. We were promised a response. Is not five weeks quite a long time to wait, especially as we were told we would hear soon? (Funnily enough, a letter from the Home Office arrived on Tuesday.)
Secondly, we were clear that we are not against the Government, but responsible for asking the moral questions. To be portrayed (by some people who should know better) as anti-Conservative is wrong, lazy and ridiculous. Every government of every shade thinks the church is against them.
Labour thought we were right wing; the Tories think we are all lefties. We just have to get used to the knee-jerk responses that this defensiveness provokes.
The job of bishops is not to be popular or simply to go with the current, dominant flow – of culture or power – but to tell the truth, even if we might eventually be proved wrong in some things. The Church cannot duck its prophetic vocation. Read the Bible and we are always getting into trouble with the powers that be - it goes with the territory.
Thirdly, many dioceses are now already looking at how we might support refugee families in our areas, including issues of housing. Some are further down the road than others.
Fourthly, comments about how the bishops should get their own house in order before “lecturing the rest of us” should be recognised for what they are. No one is “lecturing” anyone. It was a letter.
Spot the difference? And it was a letter directed to a particular person, not “the rest of us” – unless the commentators themselves are identifying so closely with the Government that you have to question the independence of their judgement.
The focus of this argument should be on the plight of refugees and the causes of their plight.
Arguing about which bishops are targets is a mere distraction.
On Tuesday, I moved from Kandy to Jaffna in Sri Lanka. We visited small rural communities and met people whose limbs have been blown off (or worse) during the 30- year civil war that ended in vile brutality only five years ago. One man with no left leg and a mangled right leg and foot cannot work and cannot support his family.
An elderly woman has lost all her relatives in the carnage and now is totally alone. We went to an orphanage run by the Church of Ceylon where we met the inspirational priest and his wife who led a group of mentally ill women through the war zone to safety; they also brought several dozen orphaned girls. They were separated and only found each other again once the war ended. The warden of the orphanage has only one leg.How many of the commentariat have actually got out from behind their screens to meet real people with real faces and real lives? Just asking. Because this is how the Church lives, and it is how the bishops learn reality away form our small island.
Syria is a catastrophe. It is not numbers who are fleeing - it is people. And their torment will continue long after they have escaped the immediate horrors.
Much of our conversation here revolves around the civil war and questions of the Church’s role in reconciliation. It is funny how similar questions about the relationship between church and state keep arising – as well as bishops’ prophetic responsibility to not keep quiet for fear of upsetting the powers.
I think our letter might have been too gentle and diplomatic, after all.