Don’t let Leeds Bradford Airport become 24-hour operation – John Pennington

A proposed link road has been refused on environmental grounds, both Leeds and Bradford councils are committed to becoming carbon neutral.

The planning application for a new terminal will increase emissions enough to use up the entire carbon budget for Leeds alone by 2026.

With no rail connection, vehicle movements will greatly increase but then be unable to park as there are no current proposals to add any additional parking. There is no need for a new terminal for the following reasons:

Passenger numbers are in decline and will do so further due to Covid-19. There is already spare capacity.

To believe that LBA can be an international airport with only one runway and no space to create another, on top of a hill, 
is fanciful. It does not serve major destinations direct 
now.

LBA does not cater for business travellers who demand a far better service and prefer rail, that is why British Airways has permanently suspended flights.

The proposal aims to dramatically improve passenger experience. The chief executive Hywel Rees, whom I have never met, admits that the level of service historically has not been good enough and that the airport has made big strides towards improvement.

Mr Rees admits that his ‘Inbox’ is full of complaints, yet LBA has a long record of not acknowledging them, as has happened to me.

The Australian owners AMP Capital have owned the airport for two and a half years. Why then have improvements not been made? Answer, they do not care. Their only concern is to make money from the fare- paying passenger, full stop. 
They have disregard for the people and homes that they fly over.

The business model to pay for the new terminal requires an increase in customers and flights: passenger numbers 
will almost double to seven million per year by 2030, an increase of 72 per cent in 10 years.

Flights will increase by 50 per cent to 46,000 per annum which equates to almost 900 flights per week.

The latest application fact sheet states that LBA already has consent to fly 24 hours but we, the public, are informed that
they only wish to extend the existing hours by one and a
half. It is just a short step to becoming a 24-hour operation.

LBA is already a nightmare (literally) for local Yeadon residents who have had problems parking their own vehicles for some time, let alone sleepless nights. This is rarely highlighted because they have become accustomed to the latter and many benefit from ancillary services or are employed by the airport.

Noise, fuel and oxide deposit pollution is experienced by thousand upon thousand of residents across a much wider area who live under the flightpath(s) and who don’t 
need an alarm clock when
the first flight of the day will
do.

The airport states that completion of the new terminal would enable LBA to meet its target of zero carbon emissions by 2023 – misleading due to
the fact that they have no
overall control over the actual aircraft.

The two relevant councils will not meet their own stated environmental aims if planning permission is granted whilst Leeds City Council must also adhere to their own much heralded Green Strategy.

The only reason to build a new terminal is to accommodate more passengers, thereby providing higher dividend payments to the Australian-based AMP Capital shareholders.

I am not against air travel, 
just this planning application. LBA is simply in the wrong location, one runway on top
of a hill and no space for expansion.

Doncaster is the Yorkshire airport of choice – excellent 
road access and an intended rail link, well away from urban centres, and with unfettered space to grow.

Chief executive Hywel Rees constantly talks about Leeds
by stating that he aims to 
give confidence to invest
in Leeds – that Leeds is open
for business and that he
tells the wider community
that Leeds is here to serve
them.

Remind me who will make the decision on the planning application?

John Pennington is the Conservative leader on Bradford Council. He represents Bingley.

Editor’s note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected]. Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Sincerely. Thank you.

James Mitchinson

Editor