Mortuary worker who received Leeds woman's decomposing body said he was 'duped' as hospital trust denies liability

A mortuary worker who received a woman's body which was so badly decomposed a pathologist could not examine it felt like he was being "stiffed", a court has heard.
Emily WhelanEmily Whelan
Emily Whelan

Emily Whelan, 25, was found unresponsive in her bedroom in Leeds on November 7, 2016 and rushed by ambulance to Leeds General Infirmary (LGI).

She died there before being transferred to Bradford Mortuary where she was tended to by then manager Andrew Gale, who gave evidence at Leeds County Court today.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Emily's family suspect she was killed but when, the pathologist came to examine her body, third party involvement was unable to be ruled out because of decomposition.

Mr Gale, who is now retired, today accused LGI of "duping" him into taking care of a body in "such a poor state".

Emily's family say her body was decomposed and unfit to be viewed when it arrived at Bradford Mortuary on December 23, 2016.

They claim hospital staff stored the body in a fridge instead of freezing it.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The family have sued both Bradford Council, which is responsible for the city's mortuary, and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, which runs the mortuary at LGI.

The Bradford Mortuary, which also only stored Emily's body in a fridge, has accepted it breached the Human Rights Act as the body was not shown dignity and respect.

However, Leeds NHS Hospital Trust denies liability.

Giving evidence, Mr Gale told the court four bodies including Emily's arrived from LGI on December 23, 2016.

He said: "Each body was in a poor state, some more poor than others.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"It seemed odd that the only bodies LGI were going to send us just happened to be decomposed.

"It's unusual to receive four bodies from a hospital in such a poor state.

"My exact words were, 'we are being stiffed here', which basically means we have been duped into taking these bodies.

"The only reason we would have had these bodies sent over is because they were in a poor state and they would rather have them kept with us than at LGI.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"I knew what condition Emily's body was in and that as time goes on that condition would not get any better."

However, when asked to specifically recall the conditions of the other three bodies received from LGI Mr Gale was unable to.

He said: "The only reason I recall Emily's body is because she was so young.

"There are bodies that stick in your mind."

The barrister representing Emily's family, Nick Brown, highlighted a number of procedural issues at Bradford Mortuary on the day Emily and three others arrived.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He told the court a number of patient admission forms had been filled out with the wrong date while at least one other had important sections missing.

Mr Gale, who signed each form, said: "It's just a clerical error."

One of the missing sections, it was heard, asked Mr Gale to describe the condition of one of the bodies.

There was also confusion on the mortuary's part about the identity of one of the individuals transferred to Bradford on the 23rd.

Mr Gale accepted it could have been one of two people.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The barrister representing Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Nicola Greaney, argued the misdated forms had not been filled out when they should have but at a later date.

When Mr Gale was asked if he could explain why some sections of the patient admission forms were missing he replied "no".

He added: "We were getting a lot of bodies coming in, we had bodies coming in and going out.

"It was a busy period, especially before Christmas."

Ms Greaney said Bradford Mortuary's paperwork suggested five bodies had arrived from LGI on the 23rd.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

That information contradicted Mr Gale's statement, it was heard, but the witness said he was "sticking with" what he had written.

Ms Greaney went on to say the mortuary had not raised any issue about the condition of Emily's body until September 2017, when her mum wrote a letter to Bradford Council.

Mr Gale rejected that, saying: "I would not say there was no issue, she was visually decomposing even more."

Ms Greaney highlighted the mortuary's paperwork relating to the state of the bodies was light on detail.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In the section where a worker was asked to describe the condition of the body someone had written 'decomposed' a The court yesterday heard medics told Emily's family she had suffered an epileptic seizure.

However, they insisted Emily had never had any significant issues with the condition, which she had managed since childhood.

An initial cause of death given as a hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury - lack of oxygen to the brain - after a cardiac arrest.

However, the underlying cause of the cardiac arrest was not determined and her family suspected foul play.

The hearing continues.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.