West Yorkshire company fined after wall collapsed on girl, 8, resulting in amputation
and live on Freeview channel 276
Leeds Magistrates’ Court heard that Gurmit Properties Limited (GPL) was the owner of a site in Barnsley Road that had previously received a large delivery of aggregate, which was deposited on neighbouring land.
Officials from the council attended the site and ordered the materials to be removed. GPL then brought the materials back on to its site, storing them behind the wall.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdOn February 7 2018, an eight-year old girl was walking with her mum along Harrow Street, next to GPL’s construction site, when she was hit by the collapsing wall.
She sustained serious injuries, including crush injuries to her foot which resulted in the amputation of a big toe.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that GPL had not assessed the structural integrity of the wall to ensure it was safe to be used as either a secure boundary for the site or as a retaining wall for storing materials.
When the materials were stored against the wall, it failed and this led directly to the collapse and the injuries to the child.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdGPL was a client and a contractor within the meaning of Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and failed in its duty to ensure that the wall was either safe for use as a secure site boundary or as a retaining wall for storing materials.
The company, which is registered to Albion Street, Castleford, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3 (1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
It has been fined £22,500 and ordered to pay £11,998.80 in costs.
Also in court: Leeds firm fined £140,000 after worker impaled on steps
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAfter the hearing, HSE inspector Chris Tilley said: “The company should have appointed a competent person to carry out an assessment of the wall at the start of the project to establish whether it was safe to use as a boundary wall and then carried out a similar assessment when the wall was then used as a retaining wall for storing materials.
“This incident could have been avoided by simply carrying out correct control measures and adopting safe working practices.
“Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards.”