Lionel Messi to avoid jail despite 21-month sentence for tax fraud

FOOTBALLER Lionel Messi and his father have been sentenced to 21 months for tax fraud but will not have to go to prison.

By The Newsroom
Wednesday, 6th July 2016, 2:17 pm
Updated Thursday, 25th August 2016, 7:29 pm
Barcelona's Lionel Messi. Image: AP Photo/Manu Fernandez.
Barcelona's Lionel Messi. Image: AP Photo/Manu Fernandez.

The disputed tax payments date back to a period from 2007 to 2009, a time when Messi helped to transform Barcelona into the world’s best team.

He has now, however, been fined £1.7m for three counts of tax fraud while his father has been given a £1.3m fine, although both men can appeal against these sentences at the supreme court.

Lionel Messi has always denied any knowledge of his tax affairs, saying he concentrated on football, while his father has claimed he left it all up to financial advisers.

Lionel Messi. Image: Martin Rickett/PA Wire.

The four-day hearing actually concluded in Barcelona on June 3, shortly before Lionel Messi left to join Argentina’s squad for the Copa America.

The 29-year-old forward joined the club’s academy in 2000, aged 13, and his family joined him in Spain soon after.

He made his competitive debut in 2004, at 17, and has now scored 453 goals in 531 appearances, winning five Ballon d’Or trophies for the world’s best player along the way.

With Barcelona, he has won eight league titles and four Champions League winner’s medals.

Lionel Messi. Image: Martin Rickett/PA Wire.

He is also Argentina’s leading goal-scorer but has found success on the world stage harder to come by, losing in four major finals, including last month’s Copa America.

Immediately after that defeat, he announced his retirement from international football.

Messi is not the only Barcelona star to come under scrutiny for his tax affairs, as team-mate Neymar was recently fined almost £40m by a Brazilian court for evading tax on his sponsorship deals.

Like Messi, he also denies any wrongdoing and is appealing against that ruling.