Asda fails to halt equal pay claim by 7,000 of its staff

Asda has failed to block an employment tribunal equal pay claim brought by more than 7,000 workers at the supermarket.

Wednesday, 22nd June 2016, 3:10 pm
Updated Thursday, 25th August 2016, 8:03 pm

The group - overwhelmingly women - work in hourly-paid jobs in the Leeds-based retailer’s stores and want the same pay as comparators in the distribution depots, who are overwhelmingly men and paid substantially more.

Asda, which says there has been no discrimination and the claim should fail on its merits, wanted the employment tribunal to halt the proceedings, which would compel the employees to go to the High Court if they wished to fight on.

But the employment tribunal said it had no power to impose a stay and, even if it did, it would not be appropriate to do so.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Asda challenged that decision in the Court of Appeal and, today, two judges have ruled against the chain.

Its lawyers had argued that, although in most cases the employment tribunal was well suited to hear an equal value claim, the case was “highly exceptional, indeed unique” and that virtually all its aspects were disputed.

Giving the appeal court’s ruling, Lord Justice Elias said that Asda’s counsel, Lord Falconer, claimed it was the most important, complex, and financially significant equal pay claim ever pursued in the private sector which, if successful, would have an enormous effect not only on Asda and its 150,000 employees, but the retail trade generally.

Counsel also said there were very complex points of law and a High Court judge would be more suited to decide them.

Lord Justice Elias said that Parliament had recognised that in some circumstances the employment tribunal might be a more appropriate forum for determining an equal pay issue than the High Court - but it had not legislated for the converse and it was not for the tribunal to exercise its general powers to make good that omission.

That was particularly so given the potential prejudice to a claimant if that step was taken, such as the additional stress and court fees involved in starting proceedings again.

Very few High Court judges had experience in this field while a number of highly able employment tribunal judges did and had built up a degree of expertise.