Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Window Sales
Sponsored by
For quality conservatories, windows & doors at affordable prices
Over 17,000 satisfied customers in the last 10 years
 
 
Saturday, 10th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Yorkshire Sport site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SHEFFIELD UNITED: Tevez affair cost us dear - McCabe



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 November 2008
Sheffield United chairman Kevin McCabe has blamed the club's financial losses for the year ending June 30 on the 'Carlos Tevez affair'.
The Blades have announced an operating loss before interest and tax of £3.5m, while for the same period last year the club made a profit of £2.7m.

Retained losses stand at £6.3m compared to a £300,000 profit at this time in 2007. Turnover is down
from £44.2m to £32.1m.

McCabe said: "One can only ponder as to the potential turnover and profitability that may have been achieved were it not for the circumstances and events emanating from the media-named 'Tevez affair'.

"Sheffield United are now a robust, strong and proud club, who will simply not back down or walk away from tackling head on those organisations responsible for the shameful actions and events that have tarnished English football."

McCabe added: "Turnover in 2008 was £32.1m, a reduction from the £44.2m of 2007, arising from our unjust relegation from the Premier League in May last year and thankfully limited due to the success of our off-the-field interests."

The Blades are hoping to claim up to £50m from West Ham in compensation next spring after an arbitration panel ruled that Tevez should not have been permitted to play in the final matches of the 2006/7 season, when the Argentina striker helped West Ham avoid relegation at Sheffield United's expense.

West Ham have argued they have already been punished by the Premier League – they were fined £5.5m – but the arbitration panel decided the Hammers had not abided by their pledge to end all third-party agreements in relation to Tevez.

The 24-year-old Argentinian striker, who now plays for Manchester United, was deemed by September's independent tribunal to have played a key part in the London's club's Premier League survival as the Blades were relegated in the 2006-2007 campaign.

"On the totality of the evidence, we have no doubt that West Ham would have secured at least three fewer points over the 2006/7 season if Carlos Tevez had not been playing for the club," the judgement read.

West Ham this week lodged an appeal against a High Court ruling in United's favour that stopped the Hammers appealing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

The matter will return to the High Court for a full trial next year when the Blades will be seeking a permanent injunction.

Both parties will meet the arbitration panel in March to thrash out a compensation figure, but it has been reported that should the case drag on, the matter could be settled out of court.
Meanwhile, out-of-favour winger Keith Gillespie has joined Charlton Athletic on loan.

Gillespie, 33, who has featured just once in the league for the Blades this term, will remain at the Valley until January 3rd, with United holding a recall clause after 28 days.

Blades manager Kevin Blackwell said: "It's a chance for Keith to get his league career going again."



The full article contains 517 words and appears in Yorkshire Sport newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 November 2008 3:44 PM
  • Source: Yorkshire Sport
  • Location: Leeds
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.