Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Window Sales
Sponsored by
For quality conservatories, windows & doors at affordable prices
Over 17,000 satisfied customers in the last 10 years
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the EP Leeds First & County site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SMITH: U-turn comes too late



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 September 2008
Chaos and confusion reign in engage Super League, once again.
The Rugby Football League's well-intentioned plan to reduce the number of overseas players in the top-flight has descended into farce.

In a bid to promote home-grown talent, the RFL have introduced a new rule restricting clubs to only eight non-federation trained players – effectively ones who have not come through a British club's junior system – from next season.

The clampdown is designed to limit the number of players brought in from overseas, who in the past haven't counted on the import quota – for example, foreign-born players with a British passport or Kolpak players from developing rugby league nations, such as the South Sea Islands.

A separate quota of five overseas players, who don't meet any of the above exemptions, still applies.

Unfortunately, the non-federation rule is proving almost impossible to apply and has thrown up a series of anomalies, which have already forced the RFL into a confusing and poorly-timed U-turn.

For example, English-born players – like Leeds Rhinos' Simon Worrall and Castleford Tigers' Kirk Dixon – faced being included on what is effectively an import quota, because they have come into the game from rugby union, rather than through a club's Academy system.

That's clearly ludicrous. The RFL should be encouraging good quality players into the game, not putting barriers in their way.

Sensibly, both players – in Worrall's case after the threat of legal action – have been granted special dispensation to qualify as federation or club-trained.

Obviously, having been classed as non-federation – and therefore competing for quota spots alongside Aussie and Kiwi imports – would have severely restricted their chances of earning a contract extension at their current club or earning a deal somewhere else.

Players like the Henderson brothers – Castleford's Andy and Wakefield's Kevin – also faced being classed as non-federation trained, despite having been born in this country, because they grew up in Australia and played their first rugby there.

Harlequins' French forward Julien Rinaldi and Papua New Guinea veteran Stanley Gene, who has played in this country for more than a decade and is out of contract at Hull KR this autumn, were in the same boat.

The RFL last week relaxed the rule, giving clubs dispensation to "renew or extend the contracts of any 'non-federation players' over and above the current limit which applies, providing those players were under contract with them prior to introduction of the club-trained player rules in June 2007".

In other words, clubs can keep the likes of the Hendersons, Rinaldi or Gene, on top of the eight non-federation players allowed under the new quota.

The dispensation will expire if said players switch clubs or at the end of any contract extension.

The climb-down has come ridiculously late in the day. Rinaldi, for example, has already been released by Quins.

The full article contains 486 words and appears in EP Leeds First & County newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 04 September 2008 8:56 AM
  • Source: EP Leeds First & County
  • Location: Leeds
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.