Sponsored by
Letter: Shocked by city’s response to march
I DON’T know what you all did this weekend, but Saturday evening, rather than staying in watching TV, or going out for some drinks, I got the train from Calderdale to attend the annual Reclaim the Night march in Leeds.
Click here to register and have your say on the news stories and issues that matter to you
Although they started in Leeds 1977 in response to the Yorkshire Ripper and the suggestion that women should stay inside if they wish to be safe from violence and sexual assault in the city, this was the third event I had attended.
As I met with over 100 other women all ready to ‘reclaim the streets’, raise awareness of the low rape conviction rate and issue of violence against women. I know lots of you were also out on the town and having a nice evening, some of you saw us and waved, or took a leaflet, or looked bemused at a big group of women all wrapped up protesting in Leeds at 7pm on a Saturday night. However, I’m wondering what it was that led a percentage of people we passed to react to us with such a degree of hostility, violence and aggression?
I’ve both worked and socialised in Leeds before, so why have I never encountered this level of abuse in the past? I don’t understand why a large group of men verbally threatened me two minutes into the march, and shouted in my face comments so sexualised and lewd that this paper wouldn’t print them even if I wrote them down. I wonder if they knew how shocked and saddened this made me feel?
As we passed with our banners and chants, did the people who acted in this manner not think we could easily have been their wives, grandmothers, sisters, partners, aunts or daughters, what was it about what we were doing that made some people act this way towards us?
I wonder if the group who stood in a line and swore, shouted and threw plastic bottles full of liquid at us near the Dark Arches would let me know what angered them so much about a group of women walking through the city protesting against violence against women? Why did this make you violent?
I would love to ask the angry middle-aged man outside the Northern Monkey pub on the Headrow if he knows how scary I found him when he was shouting and swearing at me? Did he know that I thought he was going to assault me or another member of the group? What made him follow screaming, demanding we come back so he could shout at us more when we tried to walk away?
To what extent were the threats, violence, aggression and hostility toned down because some of us had small children with us? I wonder if those reacting in this way noticed them? Was it because we were women? Was it because we were protesting? Was it because you believed women ARE actually safe from violence and threats on the street of Leeds, and that this event has no place in the city?
These aren’t rhetorical questions, I’ve been wondering the reasons all day and would like an answer if anyone can offer me one. What was it all about?
Emma Romanowicz, Longfellow Court, Halifax
Email to a friend
Print this page
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Leeds
Saturday 26 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 8 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 17 mph
Wind direction: East
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 22 C
Wind Speed: 13 mph
Wind direction: East
Comments
There are 1 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
Aruna Aiyana
Friday, December 9, 2011 at 04:59 AMI strongly support Emma and the othere women who walked through Leeds to proclaim their fundamental rights. As a man whose family were murdered, I've seen ugly male bahaviour turn nasty in the extreme. May and Salaam, the never born child, died because May hung in a brothel to support her sisters. She was a lesbian and an exceptional sports woman. If the aggressive behaviour of the men Emma writes about is not addressed, May' death will re-enacted. The conviction rate in the UK makes it questionable whether it justifies being described either as a democracy or a First World State. Unless the First World are the ugly gang of men who abused Emma, while she and the others with their children are the third world. Finally, I remind you that the Director of Public Prosecutions, commenting on the story of Peter Sutcliffe, styled as the Yorkshire Ripper, at the time, said "The real tradegy is that not all the victims were prostitues." Can you explain why he was not dismissed? I point out, first, that as I said, May died for her support for sex workers, and second, some of the finest women I've ever met were found in a brothel. Tlaegwa gee, peace and love, Brother Atha busca
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.