BBC director-general Tony Hall has described the sexual abuse by broadcaster Jimmy Savile as a “dark chapter” in the corporation’s history.
And he vowed that the review into its culture would be “invaluable” in helping to ensure such incidents never happen again.
A leaked draft report of the review by Dame Janet Smith condemns the BBC over its “deferential culture” and “untouchable stars”, and criticises it for having managers who were “above the law”.
It also warns that it was possible another “predatory child abuser could be lurking undiscovered in the BBC even today”.
Rapes, indecent assaults on both boys and girls, and incidents of “inappropriate sexual conduct” with teenagers over the age of 16 were all “in some way associated with the BBC”, the draft report states, adding that three of Savile’s victims were only nine.
Savile was found to have carried out four rapes - two of girls under 16 - and one attempted rape, which were among 61 incidents of sexual assault.
I find it incredible that 107 people gave evidence to having heard rumours of his depravity and inappropriate sexual behaviour yet no one in a position of authority seemed to be aware.Lawyer Liz Dux, of Slater and Gordon
Abuse took place on the sets of Top Of The Pops and Jim’ll Fix It, at least once on camera, as well as in corridors, kitchens, canteens and dressing rooms at the BBC Television Theatre, Television Centre and Broadcasting House, where Savile worked for Radio 1.
Others incidents occurred at the Lime Grove studios in London and BBC properties in Manchester and Leeds - where in the 1970s Savile recorded several series of his regional TV programmes, Jimmy Savile’s Yorkshire Speakeasy, Jimmy Savile and Friends, and Savile’s Yorkshire Travels, at the corporation’s old studio on Woodhouse Lane. Programme notes from the period reveal his studio guests there included the disgraced Liberal MP Cyril Smith and fellow disc jockey Dave Lee Travis, who was convicted in 2014 of indecent assault following an arrest by officers from Operation Yewtree, set up in the aftermath of the Savile revelations.
While staff across the BBC said they were aware of Savile’s sexual behaviour, they were scared to report it to managers, the draft report, published by news website Exaro, states.
Commenting after the leaked report, Lord Hall said: “Firstly, my thoughts and all our thoughts are with the victims of Jimmy Savile and their families. What happened was a dark chapter in the history of the BBC.
“Dame Janet Smith’s report will be invaluable in helping us understand what happened and to help ensure that we do everything possible to avoid it happening again.
“The review has said that the copy leaked to the media is an early draft which has changed considerably, so, while I am impatient to learn those lessons, the responsible thing must be to act on the final report, which we have not received.”
Investigations into allegations of sexual assault were “wholly inadequate”, and the BBC was criticised for failing to properly examine his personality, despite rumours about him and that he worked with children.
But retired judge Dame Janet accepted denials from senior bosses that they were aware of his sexual activity, according to the leaked document, and she does not criticise the BBC for not discovering the abuse.
While there were “several factors, incidents and conversations” that together pointed to a potential problem with the broadcaster, “I do not think the BBC can be criticised for failing to uncover Savile’s sexual deviancy”, Dame Janet writes.
She adds that no senior BBC staff were ever aware of information which could have “led to, or assisted in, the prosecution of Savile”, and that “prosecution and imprisonment” was the only way to stop him.
But she does condemn the BBC for its culture, according to Exaro, saying: “My general impression is that most staff (other than those who had been in the higher echelons) felt that the management culture was too deferential and and that some executives were ‘above the law’.”
The BBC’s “talent” was held in “awe” by most staff, who treated them “deferentially”, she said, adding: “It would be a brave person indeed who would make a complaint against such a person.”
Liz Dux, a specialist abuse lawyer at Slater and Gordon, which represents 168 alleged Savile victims - many of whom where assaulted at the BBC - said: “It is deeply disturbing that this inquiry appears to have concluded the same culture which allowed Savile to commit his appalling offences with impunity still persists today.
“That little has been done at the BBC to prevent another predatory abuser using their celebrity and influence to target the young and vulnerable is of grave concern.
“I find it incredible that 107 people gave evidence to having heard rumours of his depravity and inappropriate sexual behaviour yet no-one in a position of authority seemed to be aware.
“Now, more than ever before, mandatory reporting legislation needs to be brought in to make it a crime to turn a blind eye to this sort of offending.
“It also has to be said that Savile’s victims who gave evidence to this inquiry will find it upsetting that a report of this nature and sensitivity has been leaked in this way.”
A statement on the Dame Janet Smith Review website expressed disappointment at the leak of the draft but said it was out of date.
It said: “The review is disappointed by the decision of Exaro to publish, in breach of confidence, extracts from a leaked copy of an early draft of its report.
“That document is out of date and significant changes have been made to its contents and conclusions.
“The document should not have been made public and cannot be relied upon in any circumstances.
“The review will work with the BBC to arrange publication of its final report as quickly as possible to ensure that accurate and responsible reporting can take place.”
The leaked draft was published a day after the review announced that the long-delayed final report would be published within six weeks.
It said this was because “the review has been informed by the Metropolitan Police that it is no longer concerned that publication of the report could prejudice its ongoing investigations”.
It said final checks were being carried out ahead of delivery to the BBC and publication. Drafts of the report will have been seen by numerous parties involved in the review.