DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
  • 19/06/13
  • 10°C to 23°C Sunny spells
  • Leeds 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Thursday 20 Jun

    Heavy rain

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From East

    Speed12 mph

    Friday 21 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High19°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed12 mph

    Saturday 22 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From South

    Speed20 mph

    Sunday 23 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed16 mph

    Monday 24 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed15 mph

  • Like us
  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Leeds maternity hospitals merger plan

editorial image

editorial image

MATERNITY services in Leeds could all move to one hospital, the YEP can reveal.

Under options being considered by health bosses, care for pregnant women and newborn babies could be centralised at Leeds General Infirmary or St James’s Hospital.

There are 10,000 births annually in Leeds and that figure is rising. Today concerns were raised over access and parking if the services were moved to LGI.

Currently expectant mums can give birth at both hospitals and each also has a neonatal unit for sick infants.

But LGI is the home to the Leeds Children’s Hospital, created last year to bring all in-patient beds for youngsters together. It would be the most likely home for centralised maternity services.

A spokesman for Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust said: “The clinical director and the head of midwifery here have been doing some initial work looking at options for whether there would be benefits for the service to be centralised in one location.

“We would stress this work is in the very early stages and no such proposals have yet been drawn up.

“Should these develop into a plan this would be fully debated by the Trust Board in due course.”

He added that the discussions came after other services were brought together on single sites, improving patient care and making the best use of facilities and the expertise of staff.

“Last year, for example, children’s wards from St James’s were brought together with those at LGI in much improved accommodation at the newly-created Leeds Children’s Hospital - a move which has been warmly welcomed by parents and clinicians alike,” the spokesman said.

The £35m move to centralise children’s services at LGI were unveiled in 2007 after proposals to build a new dedicated children’s and maternity hospital for Leeds were shelved.

All care for elderly people has also been brought together at St James’s Hospital.

The hospitals combined have 280 full-time equivalent midwife posts.

One midwife, who asked to remain anonymous, told the YEP that she understood that hospital bosses were looking at moving the maternity services at St James’s to LGI.

She said that raised concerns over access, especially for people living in the east of the city, and parking for patients.

“I think centralising services in Leeds is going to lead to more unexpected home births.

“Trying to get to the centre of Leeds in rush hour is not the easiest thing in the world. I think it’s going to cause a lot more consternation about ladies getting into hospital.

“I think it’s going to have a massive impact on the public and I know certainly the initial reaction was a lot of staff would leave.”

However she welcomed the possibility that a midwife-led maternity unit might be created, as currently Leeds does not have one.

The hospitals trust spokesman said no details had yet been considered.

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page