Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Window Sales
Sponsored by
For quality conservatories, windows & doors at affordable prices
Over 17,000 satisfied customers in the last 10 years

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the EP Leeds First & County site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tycoon money back battle



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
18 February 2008
INVESTORS are locked in a legal battle with Leeds property tycoon Simon Morris.
Dozens of people who bought buy-to-let properties from his firm, Morris Properties Ltd, claim they paid too much for the houses and flats across the city.
Many say they had properties repossessed after failing to cover monthly mortgage repayments.
Attempts to cut losses by selling showed properties had depreciated by up to £100,000.
One group of 50 investors, represented by Max Gold Partnership, is seeking a cash settlement.
Mr Morris, 30, a former director of Leeds United, says that external economic factors, such as the credit crunch and interest rate rises, are to blame. He has offered £700,000 in a goodwill gesture, which was rejected by the group.
"Many (investors] have been unreasonable about what has happened," Mr Morris told the YEP.
"People bought at the height of the market. The market's changed and they want someone to blame. They see me on the rich list and they hate me and want to make my life a misery and unfortunately that's what they are doing." Mr Morris is reportedly worth £69m, eighth on The Times Young Persons' Rich List 2007 – up from 22nd in 2006.
Breach of contract and misrepresentation actions will now be taken to the civil courts, said Max Gold's head of civil litigation Hammad Ahmad. A without prejudice counter offer to accept £1m has so far been ignored.
A spokesman for Mr Morris and his company, said about the £700,000 offer: "This isn't a settlement, it's an offer of assistance for people who have found themselves in difficulties. We are offering good customer care."
Mr Ahmad said: "I am not saying that £1m is good enough. I am not saying that that is the minimum we would accept.
"If they come back with something which is going to put the ball back into play then fine. As far as I am concerned there's nothing for us to do at present except crack on with legal action."
The investment properties sold by Morris's firm in Leeds were mainly in the student areas of Burley, Woodhouse and Hyde Park. Morris Properties – also trading as Intellectual Property – is now based at Brewery Wharf in the city centre.
An advert taken out in a national newspaper in January promised to "more than double" investments within five years.
Nurse Sarah Adams was living in Devon at the time she bought four houses – three in Burley, Leeds and one in Nottingham – from Morris Properties in January 2006 for £1,050,000.
Each house has since been repossessed. She claims that each was overvalued from the start.
The 57-year-old has left a permanent job and taken up agency work to concentrate on sorting out her finances. She has lost her own home, and lives in rented accommodation in Chippenham, Wiltshire.
"If they could come up with some money it would make my life a bit better," said the mum-of-two.
"I am down to my last £1,000 which I am keeping in case I end up on the streets at any minute."
Avtar Singh Rahl, who lives in Wolverhampton, bought a property in Woodhouse, Leeds, for £325,000 in early 2005.
After he found it difficult to rent out every room in the seven-bed property. He decided to sell at the end of 2006, but found the property only worth around £200,000.
A year later the pricetag had grown to £250,000.
"It's cost me most of my savings," said the 56-year-old electronics engineer."I had to remortgage. It's really hurting me and my family financially."
The firm has a low number of customer complaints said Mr Morris.
"Sometimes you have to wonder what people's agendas are. We have always talked to customers, but we get some incredibly greedy people who spoil it for everyone else."

The full article contains 652 words and appears in EP Leeds First & County newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 February 2008 9:30 AM
  • Source: EP Leeds First & County
  • Location: Leeds
 
Prev
1
Next
1

John Bull,

Leeds 18/02/2008 10:09:14
You have to ask yourself what on earth a Nurse on say £20k to £30k pa was doing buying properties worth £1m and what bank was daft enough to lend her the money??
2

R.S.,

Leeds 18/02/2008 11:30:46
Having read the story, I'm struggling to see what Simon Morris has done wrong, it appears that he's just sold properties like any other agent, and the buyers have been hit by the economic and property price downturn like many thousands of other property owners and investers across the country. Why is that Simon Morris's fault?
3

yeldor,

kansas, usa 19/02/2008 04:17:24
just a thought...why were these people so greedy and financially inept to know it was a gamble from the outset, i guess greed played its part, markets didnt work there way and they look for someone else to blame...invest at your own peril.
4

Big Franco,

Nottingham 20/02/2008 15:40:38
RS, the decision on whether or not Simon Morris has done anything wrong is currently in the hands of the Serious Fraud Squad.

The Panorama programme presented a case where a £75,000 property was 'valued' and sold at £300,000. We are currently experiencing a slowdown/slight downturn in the property market. Do you seriously think that our current economic conditions (cliched credit crunch) can cause a property to lose 75% of its value?!! This is way off the mark from the wider 1-5% decreases that are currently being reported by lenders. Something obviously stinks!!

It's easy to blame banks for being greedy etc.etc. However, they are not stupid and follow a series of lending protocols to protect themselves (and the borrowers - so they make you believe!). In simplified terms, for them to lend someone money, the person has to prove that they can pay it back or in the event that the person cannot pay it back, that there is enough equity in the property to cover their losses.

John Bull - well put! How CAN a nurse on a 20k salary afford a 1 million property portfolio? Again, the Panarama programme supplied an insight to how banks can be fooled into believeing that 25% of equity is being payed by the purchaser when actually, the purchaser is paying in nothing themselves and the 25% payment is creatively magicked through manipulation of the numbers i.e. unscrupulous valuers have allegedly accepted backhand payments to give more favourable assessments. Therefore the bank 'thinks' that they are lending 75% of the property value but in real terms, they are actually lending 100% of the property's original non inflated value. Sometimes even more (120%) if you include those instances where cash incentives/bonuses/gifts/cashbacks are offered!!

Of course, there is always the chance that the nurse could have opted for an equally crooked route of falsifying wage slips etc. But, I'm sure that sort of thing doesn't happen!!

RS - that's what this circus is about. When was
5

Big Franco,

Nottingham 20/02/2008 15:42:22
RS - that's what this circus is about. When was the last time you heard of a director from Barratt Homes or Bryant Homes get investigated by serious fraud, get shot at, get accused (allegedly) of drugging football players, get a slot on Panarama, have a close circle of preferred solicitors and valuers being arrested and get a slot on Inside Out dedicated to them?
6

dissatisfiedinvestorofmorrisproperties,

England 21/02/2008 10:13:42
I was promised a newly built, state of the art triplex building. It was ten years old!! I was promised a full refurbishment. It never happened!! I was promised an investment property that would grow in value. It cost me £250,000, a year later it is on the market for £140,000. That is why I am a dissatisfied investor in Morris Properties of Leeds.
7

dissatisfiedinvestorofmorrisproperties,

england 22/02/2008 11:02:16
Why would anyone living in London use a solicitor from the North East to purchase a property in Nottingham, Leeds or Derby, it doesn't make sense does it, unless of course they were TOLD to do so..........
8

dissatisfiedinvestorofmorrisproperties,

england 23/02/2008 13:36:42
simon morris is blaming the very recent credit crunch on the huge problems faced by a lot of investors who bought property from his company, my property was bought from simon morris over two years ago for £250,000, a year later it is now being offered at £140,000 with still no takers. Has every property in Britain fell by the same amount? I THINK NOT....DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSION !!!
9

dissatisfiedinvestorofmorrisproperties,

england 29/03/2008 10:59:45
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Can anyone tell me why Simon Morris's company's called Morris Props and Intellectual Property have stopped advertising in the newspapers and on the internet, maybe everyone up and down our country may have at last sussed this man out. Looks like to me his high flying days are over and my heart bleeds for him.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.