Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Window Sales
Sponsored by
For quality conservatories, windows & doors at affordable prices
Over 17,000 satisfied customers in the last 10 years
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council staff reject new pay structure



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
03 January 2008
COUNCIL staff in Leeds have rejected a proposed new pay structure which would have left some workers facing pay cuts of over £120 a week.
The new pay and grading structure negotiated between the council and trade unions aims to address pay inequalities suffered by many women workers who have been paid less than male colleagues doing similar jobs.
Councils across the country have been
involved in equal pay negotiations following a court ruling that they were illegally paying women less than their male counterparts.
The deal proposed for 23,000 Leeds City Council staff would mean no change or a small pay rise for over 90 per cent of the workers but about 2,000 people face cuts.
Refuse collection crews are particularly hard hit, with some of them complaining their wages would fall by up to £6,000 a year.
While members of Unison and the Transport and General Workers unions have accepted the new structure, those in the GMB voted to reject the deal.
GMB shop stewards will meet early this month to decide their next steps in the dispute.
Neil Derrick, GMB senior organiser, said, "Members registered their concern that under Leeds City Council's proposals low paid women workers would not make the gains that they should do.
"They don't find the pay proposals fair and transparent and they strongly object to GMB members losing up to £6,000 per year."
Council chiefs estimate that the planned new structure would add about £8m a year to its pay bill.
They say the GMB's rejection means it will not now be possible to implement the new structure through collective agreement with the trade unions.
Paul Rogerson, the council's chief executive, said: "Over the past few years we have worked hard to agree a revised pay and grading scheme for thousands of council staff, and it is very disappointing that plans to implement the revised scheme must now be put on ice.
"However, notwithstanding the council's current, very difficult financial position, we are determined to find a way of implementing the revised scheme and putting the council's male and female staff on to an equal footing as soon as we can in 2008."




The full article contains 371 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 January 2008 9:17 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Leeds
 
Prev
1
Next
1

KITSANDBITS,

tingley 03/01/2008 23:32:22
refuse crews need a wage cut , they are next to useless, one wednesday a great example of stupidity was witnessed in tingley , wednesday was refuse and recycled rubbish collection day , but our refuse collection team decided it would be better to put both types of waste in to just the one wagon instead of the usual two seperate wagons, kinda wierd when you consider 2 weeks previous they were handing our orange stickers to households all over tingley (and i guess leeds in general) that were for the purpose of identifying the expected extra bags of recyle waste ,and what happened to the extra recycled waste with the orange stickers ? they went in to the truck with everything else ,well done !leeds city council you leave me with a warm fuzzy feeling inside knowing my taxes are been spent on over priced idiots wages ,whats next ?dumping used engine oil into the river Aire?
2

Robhogg,

Beeston 13/01/2008 13:12:24
"Kitsandbits" comments are deeply offensive to workers who provide essential services to the people of Leeds. I admit that, if recycling waste was put in with the general waste, then this is not good enough. To blame all refuse workers for an action by one crew (which may even have been something they were instructed to do by management), though, is unfair. I wonder how Kitsandbits would like to work outside, in all weathers, dealing with the filth that people throw out? I think (s)he would like it no more than the senior managers, in their warm offices, whose decision this was.

Some workers in the council, such as Care Assistants in Social Services, are grossly underpaid and deserve the raise which this deal would have given them. However, the other side of the coin can be seen by looking at the front-line IT support staff in Libraries who do a skilled and demanding job. Their current starting salary is a little over £11,000 a year, and goes up to a maximum of less than £15,000. The deal would have taken up to £2,000 per year off them. Can this be called fair pay?

The Council, like all councils round the country, has had over 10 years since the 1997 Single Status agreement to find the money to fund equal pay properly. The government has the money, but chooses to spend it on killing people, and getting our soldiers killed, in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm glad this poor deal was rejected.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.