Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Yorkshire Forward, the Regional Development Agency.
Sponsored by
Charged with improving the Yorkshire and Humber economy.
 
 
Saturday, 10th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

My horror over water fluoridation plan



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

IT was with shock and horror that I heard on the radio that Alan Johnson MP was going to bring before the House of Commons the suggestion that fluoride should be added to all water supplies.

This has since been modified but he plans to spend £14m of public money on fluoridation schemes.

I wish to make the following comments:

1. I do not trust the unelected, unaccountable Strategic Health Authorities to conduct fair consultations.
The law that gives power to these bodies to force water companies should be scrapped.

2. Why is the Government spending £14m of public money on fluoridation schemes when money is needed for more NHS dentists and wouldn't oral health education in schools be a better idea? Taxpayers would be getting a double whammy – mass medication and paying for the privilege!

3. The York Review did not give fluoridation a good report. It was unable to find the 50 per cent less dental caries that its supporters had claimed. They did find high levels of dental fluorosis, the outward sign of inward poisoning that only occurs in children when the teeth are forming.

Obesity

If I were tending to buy a commodity and was informed that the claim by the manufacturer far exceeded performance, I would not buy that product.

4. There are claims that fluoride effects the thyroid gland. Underactive thyroid can be the cause of obesity. Could children and their parents already be getting too much fluoride?

5. Fluoridation is out-dated. We are now in the 21st century. We care about additives in food and water. It is mass medication which is a violation of human rights. We care about them, too.

6. I hope it will not be long before Alan Johnson MP decides to spend more time with his family.

MISS P JOHNSON, Leeds



The full article contains 310 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 March 2008 1:01 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Leeds
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Mrs S Taylor,

Manchester 27/03/2008 17:40:39
I wholeheartedly agree with Miss Johnson. Dr Arvid Carlsson, winner of the Nobel Prize for medicine in 2000, said. "Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It's really obsolete." Modern drug research focuses on carefully targeted doses. People drink varying amounts of water. It would also get into our processed food and drink, and there would be no way of knowing the dose of fluoride chemical we were ingesting. It's a very unscientific approach to the problem of the terrible dental health of a minority of children.
2

Money not better Health,

Leeds 27/03/2008 19:58:18
All about Money - not better Health
1) Being paid to dumping what is a toxic fluoride by-product (mostly hydrofluosilicic acid) instead of having to pay for waste disposal....££££££s for fertiliser and smelting industry thank you
2) it would reqluire £200M at a minimum in Yorkshire to set up and regular inputs of cash (£1m a year?)to keep it going. In addition to basic plant and machinery, special tankers and reinforced roads leading to treatment plants would be needed. The costs for this are not known but certainly substantial and as the NHS doesnt have any more money to throw at this, these additional costs would come from the Council Tax.
££££s for industry and local authorities?
3) targeting dental health care programmes to those that need it, really helping children and families who need the care, having NHS dentist avaliable for all wherever you live to see them at leat 2 x a year, clealy the best option, costs too much? ££££s
4) 0nly about 1% of water supplied to domestic properties is drunk. In November 2006, the American Dental Association (ADA) announced that babies up to one year old should avoid fluoridated water because they are at high risk of developing dental fluorosis. This defect of teeth development may result in staining, pitting and corrosion of the enamel. It is common in fluoridated areas. Fluoride in foods and beverages, made with fluoridated water can result in
fluoride over-consumption, visible in young children as dental fluorosis; white spotted, yellow, brown and/or pitted teeth. Dentists get paid to fix this with veneers etc. ££££s
5) adding Fluoride to the water will, according to extremely conservative projections, increase cancer deaths in the UK by at least six people per day.
6)meeting spurious health targets on child tooth decay using a non medicine with non scientific research from the time when radiation, smoking, asbestos and pesticides were said to caused no harm......just plain stupid, but there is lota money to ma
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Is the Government right to restore cannabis to Class B status?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.