Common misconceptions
Published Date:
30 July 2008
YOUR correspondents objecting to proposed developments of Headingley Stadium and the city centre share common misconceptions. That a) doing nothing is an option; b) there are problem-free options and c) nothing producing a problem should be considered.
But every decision has a consequence which, whether foreseeable or desirable, may be addressed when it occurs. If what is desired is preferable to possible adverse results, it should proceed.
Here both objections concern the enhancement of the city's prestige and capacity. In this context 'Mac's Grubby-Grub Diner' is sacrificed and Headingley's housing stock further diminished and "over-studented".
Unfortunate outcomes, whose effects can be redeemed by compensatory measures (ie alternative sites, greater investment, higher landlord standards, better policing and cleaning services, closer co-operatio n with the universities, tougher anti-social sanctions, etc, etc).
Leeds should continue to "stack 'em high and sell 'em cheap".
PAUL KILROY, Spennithorne Avenue, Leeds
The full article contains 152 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
-
Last Updated:
30 July 2008 1:15 PM
-
Source:
n/a
-
Location:
Leeds
