Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Yorkshire Forward, the Regional Development Agency.
Sponsored by
Charged with improving the Yorkshire and Humber economy.
 
 
Friday, 16th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Otton set to lead United points hearing



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 April 2008
Retired High Court judge Sir Philip Otton was today being touted as the man with the task of chairing Leeds United's independent arbitration against the Football League.
Otton is reported to have been chosen as the head of a three-man panel which will rule on the validity of United's pre-season 15-point deduction during the week commencing April 14.

Otton, who retired from the Court of Appeal in 2001, has considerable experience of football arbitration matters, and chaired the hearing into the dispute over West Ham United's signing of Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano.

He was also responsible for the Premier League proceedings into allegations Chelsea made an illegal approach for England international Ashley Cole prior to the defender's transfer from Arsenal to Stamford Bridge.

Leeds declined to comment today when asked about reports of Otton's appointment. The club have agreed to a confidential hearing with the Football League, who are being asked to defend and justify their points penalty.

Otton is said to have been joined on the panel by Peter Cadman, who has been involved in a number of previous Premier League disciplinary commissions, and former Premier League chief executive Peter Leaver.
United will urge the panel to overturn a penalty which chairman Ken Bates claims was unfair and unjustified.

The full article contains 221 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 April 2008 2:45 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Leeds
 
Prev
1
Next
1

,

01/04/2008 09:02:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

S M T Western,

Yorkshire 01/04/2008 15:08:24
It would be useful if YP could outline the process that will be followed at the hearing e.g. will it be like a court with witnesses, submissions etc. Or is the function of the judge to try and get the parties to agree. What happens if they don't?
3

,

02/04/2008 08:52:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.